I want to answer this question by considering Art as an acclivity of human beings, as one of their existentials. And existential means “how can I imagine a human being without it?” I cannot imagine a human being without food, without shelter, without protection. And I cannot imagine it without the arts. So there is a healthy way to live with eating, live with the fact that we need protection, and to live with the fact that we need to have a life that allows humanity to go on. Now art is interesting, because one could think “oh we could live without it”, however humanity never lived without it in a healthy way. Most are regulated with rituals: the rituals of healing, the rituals of social change, and individual change in the world, like marriage, or becoming an adult. And in all these rituals you can see art: music, poetry, story telling, and so forth. So, in that sense there is a healthy way to go on with the arts. If the arts are misused, as being propaganda, or for selling something, then it is not used in the right way, however, we are not making a law of forbidding it. We just say, that art should have its own way of manifesting itself. It’s kind of a healthy companion. If I can bring in my story and share it with other people through poetry, then I feel better being understood by people. If I am able to sing, or make a song, together with somebody else, or in groups, then it is a wonderful ritual of being in an ensemble, in teamwork. And if you are able to make a theatre play that shows situations in life that touch us, and give a sense of empathy with certain life situations, we feel understood as people. And it is less likely that people stay alone with their suffering, and that they have nothing else than to talk about it and not having someone there to share it with. So it is a way of taking care of health, and it is not only to take care of the existentials like health, like eating, like sheltering, also like sharing the story of life and giving each other support.